home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.rain.org!Pjwhite
- From: jwhite1@rain.org
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Subject: Re: Is 33.6 only available for USR?
- Date: Sat, 27 Jan 96 18:20:46 GMT
- Organization: RAIN Public Access Internet (805) 967-RAIN
- Message-ID: <4ee50n$qee@news.rain.org>
- References: <4dd14b$odp@grid.direct.ca> <4ddchf$c4i@shellx.best.com> <30FA9B32.4862@fishnet.net> <4dh7j3$81i@shellx.best.com> <30FCE339.36B9@fishnet.net> <4dlt8f$1qom@seminole.gate.net> <DLGM5w.H8o@freenet.carleton.ca> <4dqj68$dcak@navajo.gate.net> <eric-
- <4e5na1$1cpq@seminole.gate.net> <3106E82D.768F@fishnet.net> <4edlo9$1reo@seminole.gate.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: @user04.term2.ventura.rain.org
- X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4
-
- In article <4edlo9$1reo@seminole.gate.net>,
- dhaire@gate.net (doug haire) wrote:
- >John White (jwhite@fishnet.net) wrote:
- >: doug haire wrote:
- >: > BS... pure and simple... Here, take a look at this:
- >: >
- >: > {On} 08/05/94 5:49 am 26400 bps ours II 08/05/94
- >: > Z 983040 115200 bps 11327 cps 0 errors 1 1024 d:/download/1x30.tst
- 17972
- >: > Z 327680 115200 bps 7465 cps 0 errors 0 1024 d:/download/2x10.tst
- 17972
- >: > Z 196608 115200 bps 4302 cps 0 errors 0 1024 d:/download/3x06.tst
- 17972
- >: > Z 131072 115200 bps 3173 cps 0 errors 0 1024 d:/download/4x04.tst
- 17972
- >: > Z 524288 115200 bps 9395 cps 0 errors 0 1024 d:/download/5x16.tst
- 17972
- >: > Z 306613 115200 bps 3276 cps 0 errors 0 1024
- d:/download/telexchg.zip 17972
- >: > {Off} 08/05/94 6:00 am 11:01 791-3625
- >: >
- >: > Please note the first line of the transfers. The file is a large, highly
- >: > compressible file and the port speed is obviously 115200. The other files
- >: > are of varying compressibility.
- >: >
- >: > I get so tired of people who make claims that are without any substance
- >: > whatsoever.
- >: >
- >
- >: Nonsense. Your data show something VERY strange. The date is 8/5/94.
- >: There was no 33.6 then. Please don't try and prove your point of view
- >: with this "data" Ha! How can we beleive the data when something that
- >: obvious is so SCREWED up!
- >
- >First, let me point out something you seemed to have overlooked. The DTC
- >rate was 26400. You made the false conclusion that V.42bis has something
- >to do with the V.34+ code.
- >
- >Second, I beta tested the USR Courier code for V.FC, then V.34, then V.34+
- >
- >Want to make some more stupid observations?
- >
- >
- >
-
- No thanks we have had enough stupid presentation of "Beta"
- data. How about some data from "Released products". Those the public will be
- using! Beta test results can be invalid obviously if the code has been changed
- since. I agree with other observation though that the PPI does transfer data
- at higher CPS than the Courier. In my testing I found about a 75 Cps
- averageimprovement over the Courier when downloading LARGE 1-4 Meg files.
- I made the comparison between a PPI LCD and a Courier using RELEASED Code
- not that from BETA results a year and a half ago.
-